Click Chemistry With Dpeg T N T

Click Chemistry Crosslinking with dPEG®

BioDesign™, by Vector Laboratories, provides extensive crosslinker offerings for use in applications where precision is required. One of these offerings is our proprietary dPEG® linkers, which are synthesized from high purity building blocks in a series of stepwise reactions to provide specific molecular weights, organic moieties, functional groups, and architectures. These products are part of our click chemistry crosslinking reagents and are well suited for a variety of uses.

What is dPEG?

The term “dPEG®” is Vector Laboratories’ trademarked acronym for “discrete polyethylene glycol” or “discrete PEG“. The “discrete” portion of the dPEG trademark indicates single molecular weight PEG technology and can help simplify product analysis. Comparatively, traditional PEGs are not single compounds.

Like traditional PEGs, our products contain an amphiphilic backbone of repeating ethylene oxide units. The term “amphiphilic” means that the compound is soluble in both water (or aqueous buffer) and organic solvents. All PEG products that do not contain hydrophobic substituents are soluble in water and in a variety of organic solvents. The addition of hydrophobic groups to PEG reduces the water solubility of some PEG products.

Vector Laboratories developed and continues to manufacture these monodisperse PEG products using our proprietary synthetic and purification processes.

What is click chemistry?

Barry Sharpless coined the term click chemistry in 1998 [1]. He specified that these reactions are:
  • high yielding
  • stereospecific
  • modular
  • wide in scope
According to Sharpless, click chemistry reactions must “generate only inoffensive byproducts that can be removed by nonchromatographic methods….” Moreover, such reactions must be simple to perform with readily available starting materials and reagents. Additionally, they must be able to be conducted in benign solvents, such as water, or easily removable solvents. The resulting product “must be stable under physiological conditions” [1]. Click chemistry has become enormously important in chemical synthesis since Sharpless’s original paper. In 2022, the Nobel Prize in Chemistry was awarded to Carolyn R. Bertozzi, Morten Meldal, and K. Barry Sharpless for their work on click chemistry and bioorthogonal chemistry.

Why use click chemistry?

Numerous compounds and macromolecular constructs can be synthesized via click chemistry, thus solving many synthetic chemistry problems. These products include organic and organometallic nanoparticles, dendrimers, small molecule drugs, peptide drugs, and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs).

Click chemistry qualifies as environmentally friendly “green chemistry” due to its use of benign or easily removable solvents [2]. Additionally, typical click chemistry reactions run faster in water than in organic solvents [1]. Research and experience demonstrate that click chemistry can be a highly useful synthetic process for reactions that require aqueous environments, such as cell-based assays [3]. Unfortunately, some types of click chemistry – for example, copper(I)-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) – require cytotoxic metal salts. However, strain-promoted azide-alkyne cycloaddition (SPAAC), avoids these harmful salts.

Click chemistry crosslinking ideas using dPEG reagents.

Numerous click chemistry crosslinking products are available in the BioDesign portfolio, including  azido-dPEG®11-amine (QBD-10524) (Figure 1). This dPEG reagent has an azide group and a primary amine residing on opposite ends of a single molecular weight PEG linker (molecular weight of 570.67 Daltons; linker length of 36 atoms, ≈42.7 Å).

Cc Crosslinking Dpeg Fig1

Figure 1: Azido-dPEG®11-amine: a BioDesign click chemistry crosslinking reagent.

This product crosslinks carboxylic acids with alkyne-containing compounds. The amine end of the molecule forms amide bonds with carboxyl groups directly using a carbodiimide such as EDC. More commonly, the amide bond forms by reacting the amine with an active ester such as an N-hydroxysuccinimidyl (NHS) or 2,3,5,6-tetrafluorophenyl (TFP) ester. On the opposite end of the linker, the azide group reacts with alkyne-containing molecules via click chemistry reactions such as CuAAC or SPAAC. Please see Scheme 1 below.

Cc Crosslinking Dpeg Sc1

Scheme 1: Click chemistry crosslinking reactions using azido-dPEG®11-amine. In this scheme, both copper-catalyzed and copper-free click chemistry reactions are shown.

The crosslinking properties of azido-dPEG®11-amine give it utility in a wide range of applications, including surface modification, small molecule crosslinking, and atomic force microscopy.

Surface modification

Non-specific interactions are a common frustration for scientists. Proteins, peptides, and nucleic acids stick randomly to uncoated metal, plastic, or glass surfaces, and can lead to erroneous outcomes. This problem complicates western blots, ELISAs, the analysis of column fractions collected in plastic or glass tubes, and many other areas of study. Several methods exist to reduce or eliminate these non-specific interactions. These methods include coating glass surfaces with sugars [4], silanization [5], and many types of PEGylation [6] [7]. Suppose, though, that you want to eliminate non-specific interactions and, at the same time, coat your surface with a reactive coating that allows for further modification? Using the crosslinker, azido-dPEG®11-amine, you functionalize the surface with carboxylic acid groups, activate them, and then react the crosslinker with the activated surface. The result is shown in Figure 2.

Surface Functionalized with Carboxylic Acid Groups

Cc Crosslinking Dpeg Fig2

Surface now PEGylated and azidoated for click chemistry reactions

Figure 2: Surface coating with azido-dPEG®11-amine.

A dense coating of dPEG molecules reduces or eliminates non-specific binding. This coating, though, leaves many closely spaced azide groups sticking up from the surface. These azide groups can react with some target molecules (a small molecule, peptide, or protein into which an alkyne group has been installed). However, steric hindrance (crowding) prevents most of the azide groups from reacting with the target alkyne. The unreacted azides are effectively wasted.

Cc Crosslinking Dpeg Fig3

Figure 3: Product QBD-10278 m-dPEG®8-amine.

A better way to coat the surface is to mix the crosslinker with a methoxy-terminated dPEG amine. In this scenario, combining  m-dPEG®8-amine (QBD-10278) (29.7 Å )(Figure 3) in a ratio of >3:1 with azido-dPEG®11-amine (44.2 Å ) crosslinker will achieve the results shown in Figure 4.

Surface Functionalized with Carboxylic Acid Groups

Cc Crosslinking Dpeg Fig4

Surface now PEGylated, partly azidoated for click chemistryreactions, and fully blocked with m-DPEG®8 to prevent non-specific interactions with the surface.

Figure 4: Mixed surface coating of azido-dPEG®11-amine and m-dPEG®8-amine.

This type of coating reduces non-specific binding. Fewer azide groups on the surface result in less crowding of the subsequent alkyne reactants. In turn, reduced steric crowding facilitates the introduction of large molecules, such as peptides and proteins, onto the surface. Thus, the decreased steric hindrance may prove particularly advantageous when carrying out SPAAC click chemistry with cyclooctyne groups that are often bulky.

Protein/Peptide/Small Molecule Crosslinking

Dr. Ravi S. Kane, formerly at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, used structure-based design to develop a heptavalent anthrax toxin inhibitor [8]. The inhibitor consisted of a seven-membered β-cyclodextrin core. The primary hydroxyl groups of the β-cyclodextrin core were then converted to terminal alkyne groups by reaction with propargyl bromide. Using copper-catalyzed click chemistry, Dr. Kane’s group reacted the heptavalent alkyne with azido-dPEG®11-amine in high yield. Next, they reacted the free amines, first with chloroacetic anhydride and then with a peptide that modeling studies strongly suggested would inhibit the formation of anthrax toxin (Figure 5).
Cc Crosslinking Dpeg Fig5
Figure 5: The reaction scheme used to develop a heptavalent anthrax toxin inhibitor: (a) TBDMSCI, pyridine, 0 ˚C -rt; (b) NaH, MeI, THF; (c) NH4F, MeOH, reflux; (d) NaH, propargyl bromide, DMF, 0 ˚C -rt; (e) CuSO4, sodium ascorbate, THF/H2O/t-BuOH (0.5:1:1), 80 ˚C; (f) chloroacetic anhydride, triethylamine; and (g) peptide, DMF, DBU, triethylamine. This image is taken from reference [7], below, and is reprinted by permission, copyright 2011, American Chemical Society.

The result was a well-defined macromolecular structure with precise spatial control that appeared from modeling studies to be able to inhibit the formation of anthrax toxin (Figure 6).

Cc Crosslinking Dpeg Fig6
Figure 6: A heptavalent anthrax toxin inhibitor built by structure-based design using BioDesign’s azido-dPEG®11-amine: (a) Structure of the LF-binding face of [PA63]7. Residues 184, 187, 197, and 200, which from part of the peptide-binding site are shown in purple. (b) Structure of the core, β-cyclodextrin. (c) Scheme illustrating the binding to [PA63]7 of a heptavalent inhibitor, synthesized by the attachment of seven inhibitory peptides to the β-cyclodextrin core via an appropriate polyethylene glycol linker. This image is taken from reference 8, below, and is reprinted by permission, copyright 2011, American Chemical Society.

In testing the heptavalent anthrax toxin inhibitor, six out of seven rats treated with the inhibitor and exposed to anthrax did not develop anthrax. Conversely, rats exposed to anthrax and either not treated with inhibitor or treated with a placebo inhibitor developed anthrax symptoms and died.

CuAAC is a simple reaction that gives high yields with minimal byproducts. This research shows the power of using click chemistry with a dPEG reagent to exert spatial control over macromolecular product design. The precise spatial control needed to position the inhibiting peptide from the β-cyclodextrin core would not have been possible with a dispersed PEG. Only with a single molecular weight PEG (dPEG) could that kind of control been obtained. Having a single molecular weight PEG product allows greater control over product design and purity. As demonstrated in the example, compared to traditional, dispersed PEGs, a dPEG compound simplifies product analysis.

Atomic Force Microscopy

Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) is a type of scanning probe microscopy with a resolution to fractions of a nanometer. One application of AFM measures the force between a probe and a sample. This use of AFM is known as force spectroscopy, which is when “single (bio-) molecular bonds are actively broken to assess their range and strength” [9].

In single-molecule AFM force spectroscopy (SMFS), compounds of interest are attached by linkers to the cantilevers used to measure the force. Each cantilever attaches a single molecule [9], hence the name.

PEG is the most commonly used linker for attaching biomolecules to cantilevers [11] [12] [13]. However, PEG polymers are dispersed and have varied chain lengths [12] [14], making traditional PEG linkers less than ideal for SMFS.

A 2012 Master’s Thesis by Jamie Maciaszek in the lab of Yuri L. Lyubchenko reported that linkers containing a single molecular weight and chain length were superior to traditional, dispersed PEG linkers [14]. Moreover, using azido-dPEG®11-amine SMFS research in the lab of George Lykotrafitis detected and quantitatively mapped individual calcium-activated small conductance (SK) potassium channels in living neurons. The researchers joined the amine end of the crosslinker to APTES-activated silicon nitride cantilevers. Click chemistry crosslinking then linked the molecules of interest with the resulting azide-coated surface. The dPEG linker was ideal for the research due to the absence of chain length heterogeneity [15].

Conclusion

BioDesign click chemistry crosslinkers are designed for versatility and can be utilized in an assortment of applications. dPEG products, including azido-dPEG®11-amine crosslinker, are available in different sizes to better suit specific requirements. Learn more about BioDesign and additional crosslinker options here.

References:
  1. Hartmuth C. Kolb, M. G. Finn, and K. Barry Sharpless. Click Chemistry: Diverse Chemical Function from a Few Good Reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. (2001), 40, 2004-2021. [Wiley]
  2. Chao-Jun Li and Barry M. Trost. Green chemistry for chemical synthesis. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (September 9, 2008), 105(36), 13197-13202. [PNAS]
  3. Greg T. Hermanson. “Chemoselective Ligation; Bioorthogonal Reagents,” in Bioconjugate Techniques, 3rd edition. New York: Academic Press, 2013, page 771. We at Quanta BioDesign recommend Greg’s book to all of our customers. You can buy it from us. To get started, please click this link and then click “Add to Cart” to order the book.
  4. Gangadhar Jogikalmath. Method for blocking non-specific protein binding on a functionalized surface. US 20080213910 A1, September 4, 2008. [Google Patents]
  5. Nick R. Glass, Ricky Tjeung, Peggy Chan, Leslie Y. Yeo, and James R. Friend. Organosilane deposition for microfluidic applications. Biomicrofluidics (2011), 5(3), 036501–036501-7. [PubMed]
  6. Jacob Piehler, Andreas Brecht, Ramūnas Valiokas, Bo Liedberg , and Günter Gauglitz. A high-density poly(ethylene glycol) polymer brush for immobilization on glass-type surfaces. Biosensors & Bioelectronics (2000), 15, 473–481. [Research Gate]
  7. Hongwei Chen, Julie Yeh, Liya Wang, Xinying Wu, Zehong Cao, Y. Andrew Wang, Minming Zhang, Lily Yang, and Hui Mao. Reducing Non-Specific Binding and Uptake of Nanoparticles and Improving Cell Targeting with an Antifouling PEO-b-PγMPS Copolymer Coating.. Biomaterials (July 2010), 31(20): 5397–5407. [PubMed]
  8. Amit Joshi, Sandesh Kate, Vincent Poon, Dhananjoy Mondal, Mohan B. Boggara, Arundhati Saraph, Jacob T. Martin, Ryan McAlpine, Ryan Day, Angel E. Garcia, Jeremy Mogridge, and Ravi S. Kane. Structure-Based Design of a Heptavalent Anthrax Toxin Inhibitor. Biomacromolecules (2011), 12(3), 791–796. [ACS Publications]
  9. Bullerjahn, J., Sturm, S. & Kroy, K. Theory of rapid force spectroscopy. Nat Commun 5, 4463 (2014). [Nature Communications]
  10. Keir C. Neuman and Attila Nagy. Single-molecule force spectroscopy: optical tweezers, magnetic tweezers and atomic force microscopy. Nature Methods (June 2008), 5(6), 491-505. [PubMed]
  11. Bo-Hyun Kim, Nicholas Y Palermo, Sándor Lovas, Tatiana Zaikova, John Keana, and Yuri Lyubchenko. Single molecule atomic force microscopy force spectroscopy study of Aß-40 interactions. Biochemistry (2011), 50(23), 5154–5162. [ACS Publications]
  12. Timothy V. Ratto, Kevin C. Langry, Robert E. Rudd, Rodney L. Balhorn, Michael J. Allen, Michael W. McElfresh. Force Spectroscopy of the Double-Tethered Concanavalin-A Mannose Bond. Biophysical Journal (2004), 86(4), 2430-2437. [ScienceDirect]
  13. Zenghan Tong, Andrey Mikheikin, Alexey Krasnoslobodtsev, Zhengjian Lv, Yuri L. Lyubchenko. Novel polymer linkers for single molecule AFM force spectroscopy. Methods (April 2013), 60(2), 161-168. [PubMed]
  14. Jamie L. Maciaszek. Detection of SK2 Channels on Hippocampal Neurons. Master’s Thesis. University of Connecticut Graduate School, 2012. [UCONN]
  15. Jamie L. Maciaszek, Heun Soh, Randall S. Walikonis, Anastasios V. Tzingounis, and George Lykotrafitis. Topography of Native SK Channels Revealed by Force Nanoscopy in Living Neurons. The Journal of Neuroscience (2012), 32(33), 11435-11440. [PubMed]